I recently had the pleasure of interviewing Ian Dunn, Provost at Coventry University, for my higher education podcast. Our wide-ranging nearly hour-long conversation touched on everything from the financial realities facing universities to how institutions should be using data and technology to benefit students. As someone with years of experience working in and alongside universities in senior leadership roles, Ian brought valuable perspectives and insights.
One prevalent issue we kept circling back to was the financial sustainability challenges plaguing higher education, especially in light of stagnant undergraduate tuition fees in the UK. Institutions have limited budgets to play with even as demands and costs continue rising year after year. Ian argued that efficiency has to be prioritized – whether that’s back office streamlining, sharing academic resources through partnerships, or exploring consolidated procurements. He even floated the provocative idea that larger consolidations amongst universities could occur for financial and operational reasons in the coming years while still preserving local access and regional relevance.
However, Ian was quick to dismiss fears that terms like “business-like” or “efficiency” have to come at the expense of academic excellence or standards. As he astutely asked – why can’t an organization be academically rigorous AND effectively run? The key is finding the right balance between financial prudence and investing in the core teaching and research mission. Students expect value for money and the taxpayer rightly demands accountability, so running universities in a more business-like fashion may become a necessity, not a luxury.
Of course, teaching itself is evolving rapidly thanks to technology. We discussed at length both the promises and challenges of using data and AI to personalize education. Coventry University is doing some interesting work around early intervention when they spot students at risk of struggling or disengaging based on learning analytics. Beyond just tracking attendance and submissions, the goal is to enhance student support and learning outcomes. With so much student data available, the next frontier is leveraging those insights to create adaptive, personalized learning pathways tailored to each individual.
At the same time, innovations like lecture capture, streaming, and online content are changing classroom models. Ian acknowledged that the standard lecture format needs to adapt. Great content can be delivered online, freeing up precious in-person time for more active learning. Students themselves are increasingly demanding flexibility, whether they are commuters with jobs or live complex lives outside academics. Even rigid concepts like “attendance” itself may give way to participation and engagement.
All this indicates huge changes afoot in higher education, some of which may disrupt long standing legacy models and assumptions. The student body now encompasses more diversity than ever – whether defined by demographics, backgrounds, needs, or learning preferences. As Ian aptly concluded, the future promises to be interesting as universities strive to provide quality, accessible education amidst constraints ranging from budgets to outdated facilities and policies. The institutions that embrace innovation, leverage data/technology, and promote partnerships may thrive during the coming transitions. Those that cling to outdated ways risk extinction.
Interview episode to be up soon!
Comments